Skip to main content

One Nation One Election

One Nation One Election (ONOE) in India has both pros and cons.

Let's understand the concept of One Nation One Election:


One election was in the practice till 1967 in India, but it was discontinued due to various reasons such as defections, dismissals, and dissolution of governments.

But, the cycle was first broken in 1959 after the Centre invoked Article 356 to dismiss the then-Kerala government.


Pros:

1) Efficiency: - ONOE can streamline the election process, reducing the frequency of elections and enhancing efficiency and  saving time and resources of the public. The same electoral rolls can be used for all the elections.This will save a tremendous amount of time and money spent in updating electoral rolls.
2) Stability: - With simultaneous elections, there would be fewer disruptions in governance as the focus will shift on work rather than election campaigning.
3) Continuity in Policy Making : The Model Code of Conduct comes to play just after the elections are announced by the Election Commission. No new policy decisions are taken during elections due to the MCC and  key policy decisions get delayed both at the Centre and in the states and local bodies.
4) Cost Reduction: - According to a report, during 2019 Lok Sabha Elections, Rs 60, 000 Crores were spent .Conducting elections simultaneously can drastically reduce this overall cost incurred by the government, political parties, and the public. so it will be a win win situation for all.
4) Increased Voter Turnout: -  With fewer elections, voters may be more engaged and turnout can increase significantly as it save voter time and energy.
5) End of Horse Trading: Holding elections simultaneously can potentially reduce horse-trading by elected representatives, which remains a concern even with anti-defection law.  Holding elections at fixed intervals can make it harder for them to switch parties or form alliances for personal gains.

Cons:

1) Violation of Federalism:-  India is a diverse country so states have their own political dynamics, and simultaneous elections may undermine the autonomy and diversity of regional political processes. 
2) Dominance of National Issues: - National issues will overshadow local and regional issues during synchronised elections, leading to the neglect of important regional problems.
3) Logistical Challenges: - Conducting elections simultaneously presents significant logistical challenges, including security arrangements, manpower, and infrastructure.
4) Dominance of Central Parties : - Simultaneous elections might strengthen the dominance of national parties over regional ones and may lead to a more centralized political landscape.

The Biggest Challenge associated with ONOE:
Feasibility: - Article 83(2) and 172 of the Constitution stipulates that the tenure of Lok Sabha and State Assemblies respectively will last for five years unless dissolved earlier and there can be situations, as in Article 356, wherein assemblies can be dissolved earlier. Therefore, the ONOE plan raises some questions:
What would happen if the Central or State government collapses mid-tenure?
Would elections be held again in every State or will the President’s rule be imposed? Is a serious questions to be shorted before going for ONOE.

Conclusion :-  One Nation One Election aims to streamline the electoral process and reduce time and costs involved but  it also raises concerns about federalism, logistical challenges, and the concentration of political power. However, the stage at which a developing country like India is presently that has committed to be developed by 2047, the ONOE must be implemented by discussing all issues with all stakeholders and decision must be taken responsibly.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Alternatives to China's Belt and Road Initiative

Alternatives to china's belt and road initiative China's BRI is not sustainable project as it doesn't uphold the principles of international standards such as sovereignty, transperancy and multilateralism. So the like minded countries have come up with the following alternatives: The Indo-Pacific Strategy : Initiated by United States, the Indo-Pacific Strategy aims to enhance infrastructure development, connectivity, and economic cooperation among countries in the Indo-Pacific region. It emphasizes principles such as transparency, rule of law, and respect for sovereignty. Japan's Partnership for Quality Infrastructure (PQI) : Japan's PQI aimed at promoting high-quality infrastructure projects that comply with  principles such as transparency, economic efficiency, and debt sustainability. Build Back Better World (B3W)  : This initiative is undertaken by the G7 countries. It was launched in 2021, it would provide an alternative to China's Belt and Road Initiative ...

India's Historic and Cultural Ties Vs China's Economic Power.

  India's Historic and Cultural Ties Vs China's Economic Power. How China's economic power is winning over India's historic and cultural relations in its neighbourhood. In today's Geopolitical world relations are changing as fast as technology. Very recently we have observed that china is advancing in India's neighbourhood very rapidly, especially in Indian Ocean. Here we are going to analyse how and why China advancing in India's neighbourhood. There are two important aspects of this. One is India's historic and cultural ties with the neighbours and second is China's economic advantage over India.  India always talk about its strong historic and cultural relations with the neighbours. But, is this enough or is it always a positive point? In today's world where economy rules the world, historic and cultural ties has less significance. See, India's relations with Nepal are said like 'Roti- Beti relations'. If this is so then,why Nepal ...

The Real Geopolitics Behind China's Belt And Road Initiative

What is the Real Geopolitics Behind China's belt and road initiative ? China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) remains an important point in recent geopolitics. The initiative was launched in 2013. It's announced aims are to enhance connectivity and infrastructure development across Asia, Africa, and Europe, through trade routes, infrastructure projects, and economic partnerships. But here we will analyse the real nature of the initiative. Let's first understand what is the meaning of Belt and Road in BRI: Belt is short for the "Silk Road Economic Belt", referring to the proposed overland routes for road and rail transportation through landlocked Central Asia along the historical trade routes. whereas "road" is short for the "21st Century Maritime Silk Road", referring to the maritime trade route as Indo-Pacific sea routes through Southeast Asia to Indian Ocean to reach middle East and Africa. Now, let's understand the hidden motive of C...