Skip to main content

Who is responsible for poor public services in India?

What is the actual reason for poor public services in India?

Nowadays it is a common trend to say that government employees are ' kaamchor '
(don't want to work). We can easily see long queues in front of any government offices like  tehsils, passport offices, banks, railway stations, hospitals etc.
The person who gets poor service blame the staff of that particular department or office. Government also think that the staff is not performing well and launched campaign to aware the people about their rights. It is very good to be aware about the rights and government is also doing good in spreading the awareness. Then where is the problem? Are today's employees really not interested in doing work ? 
Dear readers also have the right to be agree or disagree but let's try to understand the problem genuinely. Today's an awared customer put complaint if any service is not provided. But nobody bothered about the circumstances due to which the service is not provided. In India customers are unlimited and staff in every government department is very limited. One person in a department carrying out many jobs together and overburdened. Government awaring customers to demand services like USA  but providing staff like Mozambique. Government employees are also human beings and not enemies of public but part of the public itself. They also have rights. But nobody talks about an employee rights who are working under highly stressful environment. An employee is working under high pressure from both sides - top management and public. Inspite of putting extra efforts by doing overtime he/she is unable to complete the assigned jobs.  And maximum times he/she is not paid for this overtime. It is totally unpaid overtime in many departments if not in all.
So, the actual problem is the shortage of staff in public offices. If government really wants to provide quality services to its citizens it must fulfill the vacant seats in every department. But, government don't want to recruit more employees because it believes in cost cutting. If goverment fulfill all vacant seats it have to give salary to more employees and government things salary and pension are burdens on its exchequer. This is the real problem if the innocent citizens want to understand it.
See the dichotomy that there is a huge unemployment in the country and huge shortage of staff in the government offices.
It is not only the customers who are suffering but also the  employees. Overall, it is the citizens who are suffering due to government cost cutting policies. Government knows this dichotomy but the innocent citizens are not understanding it. They are quarreling with each other - blaming and complaining each other. This blaming and complaining is not the solution because problem is somewhere else.
Thus, if the government is really wants to provide quality services to its citizens, first it must fulfill all vacant seats in public offices and then spread the awareness. Awareness is useless without providing enough resources. Fulfilling the vacant seats in all public offices is the solution to many problems. It will not only provide quality services to the citizens but also will reduce the unemployment in the country. So, government should take the responsibility of not providing quality services to the citizens and in democracy it is answerable and accountable to the citizens for it and the customers who are citizens first, must be aware about this also.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Alternatives to China's Belt and Road Initiative

Alternatives to china's belt and road initiative China's BRI is not sustainable project as it doesn't uphold the principles of international standards such as sovereignty, transperancy and multilateralism. So the like minded countries have come up with the following alternatives: The Indo-Pacific Strategy : Initiated by United States, the Indo-Pacific Strategy aims to enhance infrastructure development, connectivity, and economic cooperation among countries in the Indo-Pacific region. It emphasizes principles such as transparency, rule of law, and respect for sovereignty. Japan's Partnership for Quality Infrastructure (PQI) : Japan's PQI aimed at promoting high-quality infrastructure projects that comply with  principles such as transparency, economic efficiency, and debt sustainability. Build Back Better World (B3W)  : This initiative is undertaken by the G7 countries. It was launched in 2021, it would provide an alternative to China's Belt and Road Initiative ...

India's Historic and Cultural Ties Vs China's Economic Power.

  India's Historic and Cultural Ties Vs China's Economic Power. How China's economic power is winning over India's historic and cultural relations in its neighbourhood. In today's Geopolitical world relations are changing as fast as technology. Very recently we have observed that china is advancing in India's neighbourhood very rapidly, especially in Indian Ocean. Here we are going to analyse how and why China advancing in India's neighbourhood. There are two important aspects of this. One is India's historic and cultural ties with the neighbours and second is China's economic advantage over India.  India always talk about its strong historic and cultural relations with the neighbours. But, is this enough or is it always a positive point? In today's world where economy rules the world, historic and cultural ties has less significance. See, India's relations with Nepal are said like 'Roti- Beti relations'. If this is so then,why Nepal ...

The Real Geopolitics Behind China's Belt And Road Initiative

What is the Real Geopolitics Behind China's belt and road initiative ? China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) remains an important point in recent geopolitics. The initiative was launched in 2013. It's announced aims are to enhance connectivity and infrastructure development across Asia, Africa, and Europe, through trade routes, infrastructure projects, and economic partnerships. But here we will analyse the real nature of the initiative. Let's first understand what is the meaning of Belt and Road in BRI: Belt is short for the "Silk Road Economic Belt", referring to the proposed overland routes for road and rail transportation through landlocked Central Asia along the historical trade routes. whereas "road" is short for the "21st Century Maritime Silk Road", referring to the maritime trade route as Indo-Pacific sea routes through Southeast Asia to Indian Ocean to reach middle East and Africa. Now, let's understand the hidden motive of C...